Musing on the relationship between Ikebana and Cardigan Knitwear.

Musing on the relationship between Ikebana and Cardigan Knitwear.

There is a principle in Ikebana called ma. It does not translate easily, though negative space comes close. It describes the interval: the pause between one stem and the next, the air held within an arrangement that gives the whole thing meaning. Remove the flowers, and ma disappears. But without ma, there are only flowers.

I have thought about this often while working. In knitting, as in Ikebana, the structure is rarely what you first see. You see the yarn, the colour, the surface. What you do not immediately see is the decision behind every element: what was placed, and what was withheld.

Ikebana is practised across several schools. Sofu Teshigahara, who founded the Sogetsu school in 1927, argued that it was not a decorative art but a creative one. That the materials need not be flowers at all. That the work was the relationship between the shin, the soe, and the hikae: heaven, earth, and human, arranged in tension with one another.

A cardigan has its own three-part logic. The body, the sleeve, the fit. Each must hold its relationship to the others. Adjust one and the rest shift. There is no neutral decision in either practice.

What draws me to the parallel is not the aesthetics but the discipline beneath them. Both demand that you know when to stop. Both are rendered less by addition. Both carry the mark of the person who made them, in ways that cannot be replicated by instruction alone.

Ma as a knitwear philosophy. I am not sure I could have articulated it before I found the word for it, it seems highly appropriate more than ever.